MAIN.HOMEPAGE / 01 / OVERVIEW
AN AUTOMATIC CONTEXT LAYER GENERATOR

Schemantic builds context layersrigorously, rapidly, and verifiably.

Data catalog. Context layer. Semantic layer. Three names for a living meta data artifact — essential to analysts and AIs alike.

From your data and query history, Schemantic automatically generates a full context layer — including schema, statistics, hygiene categories, descriptions, lineage, joins, and entities, and the most-used events and attributes.

With Schemantic, enjoy your first robust, auditable, and easily maintained data catalog for your warehouse (in as little as an hour).

HEADLINE METRICS
MULTI-LAYERED PRE-PROCESSORS
200+ BESPOKE ALGORITHMS AND METRICS
LAYER CREATION TIME REDUCTION
UP TO 99% TIME REDUCTION
DEPLOYED IN ENTERPRISE
MULTIPLE FORTUNE 500 WAREHOUSES
SOC 2 TYPE II Attestations
5 OF 5 SOC 2 TRUST CRITERIA
PATENTS
50+ PATENT CLAIMS GRANTED
ACCURACY LIFT ON TEXT-TO-SQL
UP TO 550% LIFT IN AI ACCURACY
SCALE
HUNDREDS OF TERABYTES
INPUT.CONDITIONS / 02 / MESS · ACCEPTED
02 — MESS · ACCEPTED

Schemantic handles your data mess.

We build your context layer even if primary or foreign keys are missing, column names are mismatched or mistyped, joins were never documented, values are mixed with nulls and placeholders, or the semantic layer is half-finished — or missing entirely.

This is a tiny fraction of what we handle:

ISSUE-01 · MESSY COLUMN NAMING ACCEPTED
Inconsistent column names.
ISSUE-02 · UNDECLARED KEY & JOIN MAPPING ACCEPTED
Undeclared keys and undocumented joins.
ISSUE-03 · AMBIGUOUS VALUE ENCODING ACCEPTED
Nulls, placeholders, and sentinel values.
ISSUE-04 · DIVERGENT TABLE COPYING ACCEPTED
Copies of a table that no longer match it.
ISSUE-05 · INCONSISTENT TIME STAMPING ACCEPTED
Timestamps recorded inconsistently.
ISSUE-06 · INCORRECT TYPE DECLARING ACCEPTED
Declared types that don’t match the values.
CONTEXT.CREATION / 03 / TIME-TO-CATALOG
03 — Time to Catalog

Context layers as quickly as a few hours.

Manual catalog projects can take months or years to reach completeness, if ever. Schemantic delivers the full nine-element layer with up to 99% less setup time than manual approaches.

RUNTIME · DATAFLOW
YOUR ENVIRONMENT SINGLE TENANT DATA PLANE RAW DATA SCHEMANTIC PROCESSOR CONTEXT LAYER GENERATOR GENERATES SCHEMANTIC CONTEXT LAYER 01 SCHEMA AUTO 02 STATISTICS AUTO 03 HYGIENE AUTO 04 DESCRIPTIONS AUTO 05 LINEAGE AUTO 06 JOINS AUTO 07 ENTITIES AUTO 08 EVENTS REVIEW 09 ATTRIBUTES REVIEW SCHEMANTIC MCP FOR AGENTS SCHEMANTIC WEB UI FOR ANALYSTS
01 | Set up identity

We guide you to create a dedicated service account with workload identity federation and read-only access. Schemantic operates inside your VPC — no shared credentials, no raw data egress.

02 | Generate context

Schemantic automatically generates the nine-element context layer from your raw data and query history — in hours. The catalog lives inside your environment.

03 | Review & enrich

Humans review, edit, and approve metadata via a real-time collaborative web app. Tribal knowledge enters the catalog in hours — not months or years.

04 | Serve agents

Agents access the same context your analysts have — automatically, through MCP. Both inherit access from existing warehouse credentials.

TIME TO CATALOG · LEGACY VS SCHEMANTIC
LEGACY · MANUAL MONTHS — YEARS
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━▸
REACHES COMPLETENESS RARELY · DRIFTS BACK
SCHEMANTIC · AUTOMATED HOURS
━━▸
UP TO 99% LESS SETUP TIME AND MAINTENANCE TIME
STEP-01 · SETUP
HOURS TO INITIAL CONTEXT LAYER
UP TO 99% LESS SETUP TIME AND UP TO 99% LESS MAINTENANCE TIME.

The full nine-element catalog — schema, statistics, hygiene, descriptions, lineage, joins, entities, events, attributes — produced automatically.

STEP-02 · Validation
HOURS TO VALIDATE
A REVIEWER WHO KNOWS YOUR WAREHOUSE CONFIRMS IT.

Applies to typical 50th-percentile enterprise warehouse — e.g.: ~1,000 tables, ~10,000 columns, ~10 TB.

RESEARCH.THESIS / 04 / THE CASE FOR CONTEXT LAYERS
Thesis

The context layer is foundational to enterprise AI.

In February 2026, OpenAI announced Frontier, naming "a semantic layer for the enterprise" as its foundational pillar. A few days earlier, OpenAI's data team published "Inside OpenAI's in-house data agent," describing how they painstakingly built six context layers on their internal data for agents and analysts using six methods: schema metadata extraction, query history mining, human annotation, codebase crawling, institutional knowledge processing, and a memory loop that persists corrections.

CITATIONS
Feb 2026 · OpenAI
Frontier announced — "a semantic layer for the enterprise" named the foundational pillar.
Jan 2026 · OpenAI data team
"Inside OpenAI's in-house data agent" — six context layers, six methods, built painstakingly.
RESEARCH.THESIS / 05 / SIX METHODS · KNOWN LIMITS
05 — The traditional / current leading methods

Leading edge methods are effective and limited.

CODE METHOD SIGNAL SOURCE
Method-01 Schema metadata extraction Schema / DDL
Method-02 Query history mining Query logs
Method-03 Codebase crawling Source repositories
Method-04 Institutional knowledge processing Docs / wikis / people
Method-05 Human annotation People
Method-06 Memory loop that persists corrections Feedback over time

These methods are effective and effortful, and some are probabilistic, leading to increased errors, less coverage, or both — particularly in diverse and difficult enterprise data scenarios.

Where the signal degrades
Challenge-01
Warehouses are new or recently migrated
Challenge-02
Documentation is limited or key employees have churned
Challenge-03
Historic query usage is sub-optimal
Challenge-04
Data changes faster than the layer can be maintained
Challenge-05
Identities are reflected inconsistently across systems
Challenge-06
A customer's data spans multiple providers
RESEARCH.THESIS / 06 / THE PROPOSAL
06 — The proposal

A more powerful method for context layer creation.

We propose an incremental and more effective method, which introduces deterministic, multi-layered pre-processing. Through multi-layered statistical inference — combined with traditional methods such as query and usage mining — Schemantic generates more accurate and complete context layers in enterprise data warehouses. Schemantic is covered in part by 50+ patent claims granted by the USPTO.

Schemantic builds schema, statistics, hygiene, descriptions, lineage, joins, entities, and the most-used events and attributes — in as little as an hour, typically saving several hundred to thousands of hours of manual effort per warehouse.

METHOD
STATISTICALLY RIGOROUS
90%+ PURE MATH

The catalog in addition to traditional techniques like query mining, leverages multi-layered deterministic pre-processors that include over 200 bespoke algorithms and metrics. LLMs are used primarily for specific semantic assessments and virtually every element remains auditable to the data that produced it.

Generation coverage per warehouse
≥95% GENERATED & VALIDATED AUTOMATICALLY
<5%
Over 95% of layer elements are generated and validated automatically; the manual remainder is prioritized for human review, typically completed within hours.
RESEARCH / 07 / WHY THIS MATTERS
07 — WHY THIS MATTERS

LLMs fail on raw data.

Without a maintained context layer, AI reliability collapses on real-world schemas, yielding only 15% to 45% accuracy on enterprise benchmarks. With one, accuracy can climb up to 92.5% in third-party research.

WITHOUT CONTEXT LAYER
15–45%
██████████████████

AI accuracy collapses on real-world schemas. Agents hallucinate joins, miss entities, and misread metrics — the failure mode is silent.

WITH CONTEXT LAYER
UP TO 92.5%
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████

Accuracy climbs to enterprise-grade in third-party research. The catalog anchors every answer in named, validated structure.

RESEARCH NOTES
Named the context layer as the missing piece for enterprise AI.
Independently called out the same gap: without context, enterprise AI stalls.
▸ BENCHMARKS
Real-world enterprise benchmarks place no-context AI at 15–45% accuracy; with a maintained context layer, results climb up to 92.5%.[1][2][3] [1] Ramaswamy · Sequoia · [2] AtScale · TPC-DS · [3] Sequeda et al. · arXiv
CATALOG / 08 / NINE ELEMENTS
08 — THE CATALOG

The nine context layer elements

Here's what Schemantic helps you ship — most automatically and a few with limited review and validation. Five metadata elements describe your data; four query-able objects compose into queries.

ID ELEMENT DESCRIPTION
Element-01 SCHEMA Virtually every table, column, and type inventoried automatically.
Element-02 STATISTICS Over 100 different descriptive stats calculated across columns, tables, and joins.
Element-03 HYGIENE 15+ quality categories surfaced at four grains.
Element-04 DESCRIPTIONS Generated descriptions for most tables and publicly-documented columns.
Element-05 LINEAGE Whole-warehouse upstream and downstream, derived from query history.
Element-06 JOINS Virtually every valid join between column pairs from different tables, confidence-scored.
Element-07 ENTITIES Virtually every entity in your warehouse, mapped — even when the same object lives in dozens of tables.
Element-08 EVENTS How entities interact and when, proposed from your historic activities.
Element-09 ATTRIBUTES What characterizes each entity, proposed from your historic activities.
HYGIENE / 09 / QUALITY ISSUES BY GRAIN
09 — HYGIENE

Find quality issues before something breaks.

Acquisitions, team turnover, platform migrations, years of organic growth — every enterprise warehouse accumulates quality issues that no metadata query alone can find.

TABLES
  • Missing, null, or duplicate primary keys
  • Duplicate tables
  • Date gaps
  • Orphaned tables
COLUMNS
  • Mistyped columns
  • All or mostly null columns
  • Implausible values
  • Single-value columns
JOINS
  • Broken joins
  • Mixed-type joins
  • Mismatched column names
  • Transforms required
ENTITIES
  • Inconsistent column names
  • Inconsistent types
  • Orphaned entities
MCP / 10 / AGENT QUERY FLOW
10 — AGENTS

Reduce inaccuracies from your agents.

Schemantic exposes the context layer via MCP. Agent answers are anchored in a maintained catalog, so there is drastically less information the agent has to calculate, guess, or hallucinate on the fly.

The catalog reduces low-accuracy guessing by pre-computing the joins, entities, events, and attributes the agent would otherwise have to derive (potentially inaccurately) on every query.

AGENT · CONTEXT QUERY
AGENT QUERIES WITHOUT CONTEXT LAYER RAW SCHEMA GUESSES ✗ WRONG WITH SCHEMANTIC CONTEXT LAYER MCP PROTOCOL CONTEXT LAYER ✓ CONTEXT GROUNDED AGENT ACCURACY ENTERPRISE BENCHMARKS 15–45% WITHOUT CONTEXT LAYER LIFT UP TO 92.5% WITH SCHEMANTIC
COMPLIANCE / 11 / SECURITY POSTURE
11 — SECURITY

No raw data egress.

Schemantic compute runs against your warehouse. SOC 2 Type II attested across all five Trust Service Criteria.

ATTESTATION
SOC 2
TYPE II
CRITERIA
5 / 5
SOC 2 TRUST SERVICE
ACCESS
READ-ONLY
OAUTH 2.0 / IAM
SECURITY CLAIMS · STATUS
Read-only access
Read-only, per-workspace service-account credentials (OAuth 2.0 / IAM). No write access requested or required.
Compute in your cloud
All calculations on raw data execute inside your cloud environment.
No raw data egress
Row-level data and table contents — including values like minimums, maximums, and modes — do not leave your cloud. Where the UI displays such a value, it is passed through at render time and never stored externally.
Encrypted metadata only
Only structural metadata and aggregate statistics (schemas, types, null rates, row counts, join scores) are temporarily held outside your cloud — encrypted at rest and in transit, hashed where applicable.
Strict tenant isolation
Strict tenant isolation — no data co-mingling across customers. Deleted after subscription termination.
SOC 2 Type II attested
SOC 2 Type II attested across all five Trust Service Criteria.
PLATFORMS / 12 / CLOUDS
12 — PLATFORMS

Where we operate.

Schemantic reads from your warehouse via read-only credentials — Snowflake, Databricks, Azure Databricks, BigQuery, and Redshift. Compute runs inside your cloud environment.

GOOGLE CLOUD
aws
AWS
AZURE
SNOWFLAKE
DATABRICKS
AZURE DATABRICKS
ECONOMICS / 13 / TCO ANALYSIS
13 — ECONOMICS

Schemantic can save you money.

We can take most of the catalog tax off your team's plate.

Even when teams don't put dedicated headcount against catalog work, the upkeep is a tax on everyone's time. The math below is typical Total Cost of Ownership across tools and time, not a worst case.

LINE ITEM ANNUAL COST
Common industry catalog tool license cost per year $150K — $300K
2-3 FTE fully loaded cost at $145K–$185K $290K — $555K
TOTAL PER YEAR · LEGACY $440K — $855K
SOURCE: TYPICAL TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP ACROSS TOOLS AND TIME · NOT WORST CASE
KB / 10 / KNOWLEDGE BASE
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common questions.

For the full FAQ and product documentation, see FAQ and Docs.

A context layer is most of, perhaps everything, an analyst or AI agent needs to understand your warehouse — not just what to query, but what the data means, how it connects, and whether it's reliable. A semantic layer is one piece of that: it defines things like business metrics, validated join paths, access controls, and terminology in a governed model. A full context layer adds data quality signals, entity resolution across source systems, lineage metadata, and patterns discovered from query history. Applications query the context layer instead of raw tables, eliminating ambiguity and improving consistency.

Schemantic finds virtually every valid join between any two columns referencing the same real-world entity. We estimate 99.9%+ capture for most customers. Edge cases: creatively mangled IDs with random inserted characters, true decimal ID values without common naming conventions, and column pairs where both have highly unfavorable statistical properties. If you spot a missed join, email hello@schemantic.io.

Schemantic accesses your warehouse via read-only, per-workspace service-account credentials (OAuth 2.0 / IAM), and all calculations on raw data execute inside your cloud environment. Row-level data and table contents — including values like minimums, maximums, and modes — do not leave it; where the UI displays such a value, it is passed through at render time and never stored externally. The only information temporarily held outside your cloud is structural metadata and aggregate statistics (schemas, types, null rates, row counts, join scores) — encrypted at rest and in transit, hashed where applicable, held under strict tenant isolation with no co-mingling across customers, and deleted after subscription termination. Schemantic is SOC 2 Type II attested across all five Trust Service Criteria.

No. Schemantic is built for imperfect, real-world data environments. You do not need consistent naming conventions, explicit foreign keys, or well-maintained documentation. The system uses statistical, analytic, and natural language-based checks to identify and score joins even when columns look mismatched or contain missing values.

Hours from initial authorization to viewing valid joins for many use cases. Large or complex datasets may take a few days. Extremely large environments (dozens or hundreds of terabytes) may take proportionately longer.

For petabyte-scale or further clarification, contact hello@schemantic.io.

Schemantic exposes the semantic layer as a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server. AI agents connect through a typed, discoverable interface to query available metrics, retrieve validated join paths, and generate SQL — without parsing raw DDL or relying on prompt-injected schema context.

PROOF OF CONCEPT / 11 / NEXT STEPS
▸ NEXT STEPS

Build a better context layer.

Connect Schemantic to your warehouse. Validate the catalog in as little as a few hours. Measure the before and after.

▸ WHAT TO EXPECT
  • 01 Brief intro call with the team and paperwork.
  • 02 Read-only credentials provisioned by your team.
  • 03 Schemantic runs against a slice of your data.
  • 04 Reviewer who knows the warehouse confirms the context layer.
  • 05 Enjoy your new context layer.